Tuesday, November 29, 2016

Art and Feminism

I believe that our gender is something that highly influences the way we see the world and how the world see us. I don't think that gender differences are bad. I feel that men and women are two sides of the same coin. They each have their place and they each have value. They have different strengths and weaknesses.

I am not saying that every guy needs to be the epitome of masculinity or every girl should be the poster child for femininity. I think that we have aspects of our lives that are different from other people because of our gender. We are inclined to think a certain way or look at situations differently. That doesn't make one gender better than the other. As far as attributes of gender go, I don't think that we should label certain attributes as masculine or feminine. If you think about the attributes of Christ, gentle, loving, compassionate, thoughtful, hard-working, obedient, stern, etc., He has many attributes that may be misattributed as being girly. I think men should be able to be tender and loving. Women should be able to be strong and stick up for themselves.

If an artist is a man or a woman, their art should be appreciated for what it is and not who made it. there might be some messages or themes touched on because of their gender, but they might just as easily be attributed to their lived experiences.

As far as feminism is concerned, I feel that women should be free to make their own choices and live their life as they see fit. As long as they are not impeding other's rights, they have a right to freedom of expression and the pursuit of happiness. This touches on the burkini debate. I feel that a religion should not be stereotyped by a few members. People should be able to practice their religion without fear of being ostracized. Their relationship with God is special and should not be marred by our beliefs of how they should act.

Fear causes us to become irrational. We strike out at the things we fear because we don't want to get hurt. If we are afraid, we should use caution. We should make sure we are safe, but at the same time we should strive to understand the things which makes us fearful. Often, through understanding comes peace.

Tuesday, November 1, 2016

Guest Speakers in Class Last Week

My normal teacher for my Issues in Contemporary Art class was not able to be there last week. As a result, we had some guest speakers. The speaker on Tuesday was Jethro, a fellow teacher in the school of education at BYU. I was not able to attend on Thursday, so I don't know who spoke on that day.

Jethro told us about his art and some of the shows that he had done in the recent past. The thing that stood out the most to me was his thoughts on art changing his life. He decided to make a quilt with tally marks. He sewed each individual tally mark by hand and made a quilt with the tally marks designs that was 6 feet by 6 feet. There were around 100 tallies on each square that made up the 36 squares for the quilt. He said that the stitching became a part of his life. He would stitch while watching TV, while teaching his students, while doing just about anything where his hands could be free to stitch. The stitching was such a part of his life that it changed him. He found that once he was done, he couldn't stand his hands just being idle. He felt like he had to be doing something.

Art can permeate our lives if we let it. Living life can be a work of art. We just need to find out passion. The repetition can lead us to ingrain certain qualities into our souls. We can master a particular technique or medium. We can master one aspect of living by trying to do it perfectly. Practice being kind and you will become kind. Practice drawing hands and you will become good at drawing hands.

I think that it demands a vigilance to maintain as well. You can't just stop doing it once you've mastered somethings. You have to maintain it. If you stop drawing, you eventually get worse at drawing. If you stop being kind, then you eventually stop being able to be kind.

Saturday, October 29, 2016

Abstraction, Modernism, and Color Theory



Abstraction

Abstraction is defined as being free from representational qualities in art. This means that the art is more about the paint then about the forms represented. Abstraction can be valued based on its use of space, texture, repetition, shape, color, line, etc. It is a form of expression that is purely "art for art's sake." The artist is not trying to represent anything concrete. If any representation is meant, it is purely emotional or psychological.

Modernism

Modernism is based on the theory of formalism. They are more concerned with perfecting those traits that are purely expressed in painting. It focuses on the flat, rectangular surface of the canvas. Modernism is the purity of paint. There is no attempt to have a distinct subject matter and content is to be avoided. The movement was saying that at its core, painting is about pure aesthetic experience. Painting should be therapeutic and free from outside values or influences. Modernism saw art as something fine and high.

Color Theory

Color theory believes that color can be a vital design element if you learn to use it properly. Color can be used to make a statement or illicit emotions from the viewers. These beliefs are partially backed by science as we have seen that certain colors have a real physical effect on people. Colors can have an affect on the viewer mentally as well.

At the top of this post is an abstract painting done by one of my classmates. I selected this one because I liked the patterns and balance of the piece. A modernist would view this artwork as exemplary of the type of art that should be created. It has no definite subject and makes no attempts to represent anything tangible. This artwork would be appreciated for its use of repetition, balance, and contrast. It would be under scrutiny for how the paint was applied to the canvas and how the brush stokes were laid down. Perhaps, the use of gradients would be mentioned to draw out a conversation about the forms and shapes created. I like the painting for many of those same reasons. It allows the viewer to appreciate the piece over an extended period of time. Because there is not subject or representations to tell the view what the painting is about, the view gets to decide and find shapes and figures in the lines and contours. It really is therapeutic to just sit and stare at it as you let your mind wander.

A postmodern artist would have a very different view on the artwork. They would claim that the artist was just throwing paint around. Postmodernists are more concerned with making a statement with their art. They have a commentary that they want to express to an audience with their art. They seek to draw attention to issues, the other, and power. There is a narrative that must be found in each painting. As far as color theory is concerned, I believe that the postmodernist could also find value in the idea that some colors help to communicate various messages. The marxist theories and ideas on deconstruction lend themselves to color theory. As a critic and one seeking to interpret the artwork, color could be used to find the hidden meanings. There could be a message as you look for new possibilities in the interpretation.

If I were discussing this piece with my students at high school, there are a few questions that I think would want to pose to them.

1. What thoughts come to mind as you view this artwork?

2. How can making abstract art be therapeutic for the artist?

3. Would you hang this up in your house? Why or why not?


Monday, October 17, 2016

Thoughts on Chaco Canyon

The road to Chaco was long and exciting. I was not very familiar with petroglyphs or Native American culture from the New Mexico region. Throughout the entire time I was walking among the ruins of the Chaco culture, I kept thinking that I wished I could have seen it in its prime. The buildings were so carefully built and their craftsmanship resulted in the walls being able to remain fairly intact for centuries. There were theories that the residents may have burnt the buildings as they left, which means that the structures may have held up better had there not been an arson during their exodus.









The landscape of the Chaco region was admirable and there didn’t seem to be enough time to explore all of the paths and views. I was so enthralled with exploring and admiring the artifacts of the ancient inhabitants that I didn’t take time to make any art of my own. Instead, I was content to soak in the art present in the petroglyphs, architecture, and natural surroundings.








I took time to attend a “Moon Walk” which involved a guided tour and more information about the region. The great houses that we walked among were most likely used in religious and festival activities. This would explain why there was such care taken to building the structures. The small size of the rocks used to construct the walls shows that it was most likely a painstakingly intricate and time-consuming process. The rocks had to be mined from the tops of the mesas. The wood used in the construction had to be dragged great distances from where it were harvested. One scientific report mentioned that a beam of wood from a doorway’s lintel was from a Douglas Fir. I don’t know what the vegetation looked like back around 850 AD, but there are currently no forests of Douglas Firs in the area that I know of. This means that they either sent out parties to harvest wood or that they traded with others tribes to obtain the resources they needed.

Based on other research, it is most likely that there was greater rainfall during the occupation of the region than currently occurs. Even with that, it must have been a hard life. It was a much slower lifestyle than what we are used to. You could get a sense of that as you walked among the ruins and hiked the trails. There were no stores, no gadgets, just what you could find or make for yourself. They grew their own crops and made their own pots, baskets, and homes. I would love to learn more about their daily life. What must it have been like to live there? I know that it is not someplace that I would want to try and live right now. I admire their ingenuity and tenacity to etch out a civilization in a region that seems so inhospitable.


During our travels to and from the Chaco Culture Center, we experienced many great encounters with other people. We talked with natives in Shiprock, visited with tourists in Arches, and shared greetings with travelers at Hovenweep. I had brought a book to read, but I was more interested in conversations in the van and getting lost in my thoughts as we made our way through the landscapes of Utah, Colorado, and New Mexico. I plan to think on my adventures for many days to come and hope that they will bring new inspiration to my thoughts on teaching, art, and life.



Wednesday, October 12, 2016

Description of a Painting

While at the BYU MOA, I went to explore the exhibit on religious art. I really liked the various paintings and sculptures. Below is one that I really liked. Its realism is somethings that I really like in art.



This is my description:

This painting is a depiction of two virgins from the parable of the wise and foolish virgins found in the Bible. One of the virgins has a lite lamp and looks heavenward while the other has her lamp down at her side, the light having gone out, and looking downcast. Both virgins are young and attractive. They wear simple, yet elegant clothing. The background has classical architecture and stone masonry.

The medium is oil on canvas. The artist took great care in rendering the subjects. There is illusionary form achieved through chiaroscuro and modeling. There is an appearance of depth to the painting achieved through the use of one-point perspective. The folds in the fabric and the use of shadow give the impression of the subjects’ volume and body contours.


The painting rests on a blue wall in dim light with a spotlight to illuminate it. The frame is a golden color which works well with the colors used in the painting as well as the blue of the wall on which it hangs. The painting is among other religious art and includes references to scriptural passages and a brief explanation of the story being depicted. The painting was created in 1856. The artist is German. The story is a well-known parable from the Bible in which half of those who were waiting for a wedding party to come by had brought extra oil for their lamps while the other half ran out of oil.


Monday, October 10, 2016

Art 21 Artist Tara Madani

Art 21 showcases the work of many great artists who are pushing the boundaries of art and looking for ways to express themselves and their ideas. Tara Madani is an Iranian artist who seeks to juxtapose opposites, such as men and women, strive to question some of the stereotypes that exist in our modern society.

Here are some links to videos that feature Tara and her work on Art 21.

http://www.art21.org/videos/preview-tala-madani-in-season-8-of-art21-art-in-the-twenty-first-century-2016

http://www.art21.org/videos/segment-tala-madani-in-los-angeles

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vocCwTsVz3s

While watching the episode that features Tala, I had many different questions or ideas pop up in my mind. Most of these questions were inspired by something she would say or do during the video. Below are the various questions I thought would be good to talk about as a way to think more deeply about the type of art that Tala makes.

Entering spaces
Entering a space where you “don’t” belong
Entering a space because you should belong
What does it mean to enter a space?
How do we enter spaces?
What is the resistance to entering a space?

The smiley as religious
What other cultural ideas are becoming “religious?”
What are some of the sources of “light” in society?

How does satire help creativity?
How do these strange images help us think about life?

What does the voice of God sound like?

Cultural difference between Iran and US stories involving kids.
What is the relationship between adults and children?

How is controlled behavior the oppressor?
How are we oppressed by social norms?
How are we oppressed by our own inhibitions?
What do our views of oppression say about our own oppression?
How are we oppressed?

How is misbehavior redemptive?

Wednesday, October 5, 2016

Philosophers Speak on Postmodernity

Cornel West is an activist who has spoken out on many topics. He believes race is still a huge issue in America and that white supremacy continues to define everyday life. His political views are more aligned with Marxist theories, although he considers himself a "non-Marxist socialist" due to his feelings that Marxist and Christianity are irreconcilable. His view on postmodernism is that it stems from the decentering of the world from Europe. As the world powers have changed, the ideas and notions that were once very Eurocentric have moved to different venues and thus resulted in a new ideal. Postmodernism is thus distancing itself from the past and attempting to encapsulate the new.

Bell Hooks is a black woman who is very influential in the sphere of intersectional feminist politics. She is well known for speaking out on topics of feminism and racial imagery. She offers her critique of popular culture as she attempts to help the public analyze how the media is portraying race and gender. With regards to post modernism, Hooks speaks concerning the experience of "different" or "other" felt by black people. She critiques societies perpetuation of this feeling because there are still certain things that are simply not associated with black people. She feels that although post modernism is focusing on the other, they are not doing anything to change the fact that black people are still seen as the other. They raise awareness and point fingers, but they don't offer any solutions.

Michel Foucault has been labeled as a post modernist, but he never really saw himself as that. Instead he felt that he was a critical historian of modernity. His thoughts and and ideas have been highly influential in various areas of culture. Most notably, his ideas on gender constructs and sexuality have inspired many.

Wednesday, September 21, 2016

Art Versus Design

I feel that art and design are very similar. They are so similar that I was struggling to come up with a way of quickly and easily explaining their differences. I did some research online and I even looked at what some of my peers had already posted on the subject. The definition of their differences that I like the most is; art asks, design answers.

I like that idea of art asking and design answering. It points towards their overarching purpose. They both require great skill and technique, but they are both meant to accomplish their own specific goals. The artist wants to get the viewer to question something or feel something. The designer is seeking to answer a question that has been posed. There is a specific message that design is trying to express or communicate. Art on the other hand wants to ask the viewer to do something.

Thursday, September 15, 2016

Modernism and Modern Art

Clement Greenberg's article, Modernist Painting, sums up modernism as follows. "The use of the characteristic methods of a discipline to criticize the discipline itself...to entrench it more firmly in its area of competence." Therefore, modernism is criticized from the inside in an effort to prove that art is "valuable in its own right." It called particular attention to the fact that painting is flat. It wanted to showcase the flat plane of canvas in order to separate painting from the other arts. Instead of trying to mimic other arts and forms through shading, coloring, or perspective, painting wanted to show that it was valuable as an art in and of itself. By Clement's definition, modernism is the movement focused on looking critically at how painting can separate itself and stand apart from the other arts and therefore focus on its unique ability to contribute to culture and the arts.

Modern art is any art that attempts to orient itself towards flatness. It is art that does not attempt to create the illusion of space or form. Instead it is meant to be viewed as a flat plane.

Borders

I've been thinking for some time about the borders in my life, those obstacles that either constrain my actions positively or restrict my actions negatively. I believe that borders are necessarily bad. It allows you to say that there are some things that you just won't do or participate in. They allow us to have morals, compassion, and will power.

Some borders that I have in my life are my religion and my fear. These are the two things that I believe shape most of my actions. There are myriads of ways that I they are connected to other borders that inhibit or strength my life.

My religion has been a positive border throughout my life. It has guided my actions and thoughts for as long as I can remember. These borders I feel are entirely positive. My religion breeds within me a desire to help other people, serve my friends and family, and pay attention to the community around me. There are certain activities and substances that I obtain from as a result of my faith and testimony. I do not believe that my life has been negatively impacted from the borders imposed on me by the strong believes my religion has instilled within me. Due to my religion, I have a wonderful family. My beliefs and convictions have allowed me to enjoy a bond with my wife that surpasses all other connections. I have complete trust in my wife and I am faithful to her in a way that allows us to feel safe with one another. We have common goals and we are working together to achieve those aims. Lasting happiness comes from relationships, not things. I know that I will always be happy as long as I have my wife beside me.

Fear is both positive and negative. There are certain times where fear ignites a desire to act. The fear of losing someone causes you to reach out to them. The fear of disappointing a friend or loved one gives you added motivation to try harder or be better. Other times, fear can be debilitating. The fear of failure can keep you from even trying. The fear of looking foolish can restrain an impulse to ben spontaneous or genuine. The fear of being hurt can dissuade you from forming strong bonds with other people. I have experienced fear in all of these forms. At times I have embraced the border of fear to push forward and other times I have allowed it to make me quiver and shrink from what I could have been.

Most borders in our lives which are not physical can be overcome through practice and effort. If we are fearful, we can practice being brave. If we have a weakness, we can work to overcome it. The beauty of life is that it is constantly changing. You don't have to settle with how you are. If you want to change, you just need to start by taking the first step.

Monday, September 12, 2016

Making it Small Response

It sounds like the education of the artist is dependent on doing. There are instances where you can understand art logically or theoretically, but you may not necessarily be able to make good art. Art is very subjective, which means that not everyone is going to like your art, even if it is good. The point is that you want to reach a level of skill where people want to buy your art.

Becoming an artist takes time. It takes practice. Taste points out that it can take years before you're able to produce art at a level that conforms to your ideas of what good art should look like. Many hours go into studying and practicing to be able to produce art.

I have experienced this with my art. I love to make 3D models, but my skills were not at the level they needed to be in order to get a job doing it. I still enjoy making models and would love to get paid to do it, but I have decided to let it be a hobby. Mike Birbiglia mentioned that sometimes you have to quit. In a sense, I realized that I needed to quit pursuing 3D modeling as a career. Art is my hobby, not my source of income. I teach art because I enjoy making art and want others to experience that joy as well. I want to give them opportunities to be better than I was or am.

The other experience I have is that of failure. You can't make something great on your first attempt. You have to practice. Each time you practice, you have failures. You learn from those failures and you try again. You notice where you lack skill or technique and then you work on it. Maybe your perspective is off, you study perspective. You work from where you are and build yourself up. You don't have to be a world renown artist. You just have to be the best you can be.

Saturday, September 10, 2016

Aesthetic Autobiography Photos

Here are the images that I used in my Aesthetic Autobiography video.












I also included this short video clip.