Abstraction, Modernism, and Color Theory

Abstraction

Abstraction is defined as being free from representational qualities in art. This means that the art is more about the paint then about the forms represented. Abstraction can be valued based on its use of space, texture, repetition, shape, color, line, etc. It is a form of expression that is purely "art for art's sake." The artist is not trying to represent anything concrete. If any representation is meant, it is purely emotional or psychological.

Modernism

Modernism is based on the theory of formalism. They are more concerned with perfecting those traits that are purely expressed in painting. It focuses on the flat, rectangular surface of the canvas. Modernism is the purity of paint. There is no attempt to have a distinct subject matter and content is to be avoided. The movement was saying that at its core, painting is about pure aesthetic experience. Painting should be therapeutic and free from outside values or influences. Modernism saw art as something fine and high.

Color Theory

Color theory believes that color can be a vital design element if you learn to use it properly. Color can be used to make a statement or illicit emotions from the viewers. These beliefs are partially backed by science as we have seen that certain colors have a real physical effect on people. Colors can have an affect on the viewer mentally as well.

At the top of this post is an abstract painting done by one of my classmates. I selected this one because I liked the patterns and balance of the piece. A modernist would view this artwork as exemplary of the type of art that should be created. It has no definite subject and makes no attempts to represent anything tangible. This artwork would be appreciated for its use of repetition, balance, and contrast. It would be under scrutiny for how the paint was applied to the canvas and how the brush stokes were laid down. Perhaps, the use of gradients would be mentioned to draw out a conversation about the forms and shapes created. I like the painting for many of those same reasons. It allows the viewer to appreciate the piece over an extended period of time. Because there is not subject or representations to tell the view what the painting is about, the view gets to decide and find shapes and figures in the lines and contours. It really is therapeutic to just sit and stare at it as you let your mind wander.

A postmodern artist would have a very different view on the artwork. They would claim that the artist was just throwing paint around. Postmodernists are more concerned with making a statement with their art. They have a commentary that they want to express to an audience with their art. They seek to draw attention to issues, the other, and power. There is a narrative that must be found in each painting. As far as color theory is concerned, I believe that the postmodernist could also find value in the idea that some colors help to communicate various messages. The marxist theories and ideas on deconstruction lend themselves to color theory. As a critic and one seeking to interpret the artwork, color could be used to find the hidden meanings. There could be a message as you look for new possibilities in the interpretation.

If I were discussing this piece with my students at high school, there are a few questions that I think would want to pose to them.

1. What thoughts come to mind as you view this artwork?

2. How can making abstract art be therapeutic for the artist?

3. Would you hang this up in your house? Why or why not?